Ants In The Pantry (1936) Review // The Three Stooges #16 – “You Funny Men”

Ants In The Pantry has probably the best premise for a Three Stooges short so far. It’s a lot of fun seeing the gang just be as horrible as possible here. This is even reflected in their illfitting clothing that looks like aliens trying to fit in. The humor is a little more surreal, like having a suitcase of vermin, all in clearly labeled containers. The gags are sometimes so simple, like Curly stealing a ladder… which has someone on it. Not only is this hilarious, but it is in character with how thoughtless and self-centered the leads are. The jokes are sometimes constant enough that you can almost miss them, but it’s all so well paced that it’s not suffocating. This is the best paced short of the series up to. When Larry puts ants on a cake, you might think that’s all he’ll do, but then he pockets some sandwiches and takes off his hat, with moths flying out. Those gags aren’t interrupting the previous one and they make sense.

At one point, Moe says a line to Larry. Larry responds by mumbling the first half of a response and not even finishing it. Maybe it was supposed to be said in full, but Larry flubbed and someone thought this was funnier? While that moment doesn’t shine too fondly on him, we’ll get some quality Larry later. A maid seems to take interest in Moe when he closes his eyes and asks to kiss her. She quietly leaves, so instead he is kissed by Curly. It doesn’t make sense why she would just go like that, but it makes sense with the rule of funny, that chaos will find a way simply for the purpose of inconveniencing the Stooges and all they come across as much as possible. Moe’s response to this is great, “I’m poisoned! I’m poisoned!”

Moe tells Curly to cut some cards, so he pulls out a knife and smashes them. Curly is once again getting a Harpo Marx joke, which doesn’t make sense considering how different their characters are. “Oh boy, we’re going on a job.” “What? Already? We had a job two months ago!” This either portrays Curly as more stupid than originally thought or he is playing dumb for the purpose of freeloading. It is implied the Stooges are being paid to be on call to exterminate pests, even if there isn’t any work to do.

Curly and Larry are briefly teamed up and compliment each other very well. A minor player gets a particularly strong line with, “Where are those three rovers [referring to the Three Stooges]?” “They’re in there talking politics.” “Politics?” “Yeah, I just heard one of them say, ‘Let’s have a new deal.’” A shot of Curly and Moe obviously being replaced with dummies is very amusing. The Three Stooges vs a piano is one of the best routines in the series so far. It utilizes the poor special effects excellently by making that part of the charm. Take Larry’s legs. However, it’s really sold by how invested the gang is, with Moe’s confident incompetence at its greatest. Larry’s screaming and Curly’s confusion, topped with meowers flying around really make it special.

SPOILERS

It’s so joyous watching the Stooges throw critters on everything, including bits like Moe telling some mice to scram. Curly leaves his hiding place to literally put ants on someone’s back. Larry deciding to dispose of a bag of cats by putting them in a piano is a glorious bit of absurdism. It’s obviously a terrible idea, which makes the moment a charming insight into Larry’s character. Also coloring his character is when in trying to dispose of a mouse on a woman’s back, he tries to hit it with a hammer, not understanding he’d make a scene. Another solid moment is the “I can’t see!” joke. Larry knew there were ants in the cake, but let Curly eat it anyway.

OVERVIEW

The short suddenly changing to another plot in the last minute works because it is the logical extension of the offbeat nature of this humor, being as bizarre as possible. It, as well as the rest of the runtime, embraces the insanity of the Three Stooges more truly and frankly than ever before. As such, it dethrones Pardon My Scotch as the best short. Ants In The Pantry really follows through with the potential of this series and is a “Success! Success!”

The Monks – Three Fan Albums

For those not in the know, fan albums are the attempts of me and many others to take songs and put them on an album, typically they’re made to improve upon something, such as an existing album or to take non-album tracks and put them on an album.

The Monks are generally known and defined by their one and only LP, as if nothing else was ever made. While that’s not far from the truth, there is a little more they did. That material is consistently less hard hitting than the famous album. The group are still surprisingly strong at infusing psychedelia and pop, with the drumming a particular highlight. That being said, these aren’t must-listen recordings by any means. While The Sonics managed to get almost a second full length worth of hard edged tracks, and all the way to a third of very quality work, these stray Monks would almost best be described as a different band. If you like the famous Black Monk Time and want more of it, you should go to other bands with a proto-punk style, as Black is all you’ll get from the Monk pot. If you want decent rock tunes and interesting alternate versions of songs, then here you go, what is essentially another group.

These two album names were apparently considered to be the names of potential follow-up albums. I don’t think they’re great titles, especially because of the change in sound for one and the same songs of the other, but I thought it was cute to do. If albums of new material had come out under those names, it probably wouldn’t have been like what’s below, with album-only tracks that were never recorded.

The three “fan albums” are Silver Monk Time, which details demos and live cuts of what’s on Black and also… Gold Monk Time, which features no overlapping songs with Black. The third are stray “modern” recordings by members of the band. Just for fun, also included is the live reunion album and more solo projects, as well as a list of what exists, but I couldn’t find.

THE MONKS – SILVER MONK TIME

TRACKLISTING

SIDE A

  1. “Boys Are Boys (1964)”
  2. “Monk Time”
  3. “Love Came Tumblin’ Down”
  4. “Space Age”
  5. “We Do Wie Du”
  6. “Boys Are Boys (1965)”
  7. “Pretty Suzanne”
  8. “Higgle-Dy Piggle-Dy”

SIDE B

  1. “Oh, How To Do Now (1965)”
  2. “I Hate You”
  3. “Boys Are Boys (1966)”
  4. “Oh, How To Do Now (1966)”
  5. “Complication”
  6. “I Can’t Get Over You”
  7. “Cuckoo”

THE MONKS – GOLD MONK TIME

TRACKLISTING

SIDE A

  1. “Monk Chant”
  2. “I Can’t Get Over You”
  3. “Cuckoo”
  4. “Love Can Tame the Wild”
  5. “He Went Down to the Sea”
  6. “Pretty Suzanne”

SIDE B

  1. “Hushie Pushie”
  2. “There She Walks”
  3. “Julia”
  4. “P.O. Box 3291”
  5. “I Need U Shatzi”
  6. “Yellow Grass”
  7. “I’m Watching You”

GARY BURGER & DAVE DAY – IT IS CHARLES TIME

TRACKLISTING

SIDE A

  1. The Spectors – “Oh, How To Do Now” (1993)
  2. Alec Empire & Gary Burger – “Monk Time” (2006)
  3. The Fall & Gary Burger – “Higgle-Dy Piggle-Dy” (2006)
  4. The Havletones & Dave Day – “That’s My Girl” (2006)

SIDE B

  1. Charles Paul Wilp & The Monks – “It Is Charles Time” (2006)
  2. Faust & Gary Burger – “Beware (The Transatlantic Feedback)” (2006)
  3. Gary Burger – “I Feel Fine” (2013)

LINKS

  1. The Monks – Black Monk Time (1966) – Spotify, YouTube
  2. The Monks – Silver Monk Time (1966) – YouTube, Spotify (Incomplete)
  3. The Monks – Gold Monk Time (1967) – Spotify, YouTube
  4. Minnesoda, Featuring Eddie Shaw – Minnesoda (1972) – YouTube
  5. Lightning, Featuring Eddie Shaw – “William Tell Overture (The Lone Ranger Theme)” (1975) – Spotify, YouTube
  6. The Monks – Let’s Start a Beat – Live from Cavestomp (2000) – Spotify, YouTube
  7. Gary Burger & Dave Day – It Is Charles Time (2013) – Spotify, YouTube
  8. Eddie Shaw & The Hydraulic Pigeons – Jass In Six Pieces (2013) – Spotify, YouTube
  9. Gary Burger – BurgerMONK 2010 (2016) – Spotify, YouTube

MISSING RECORDINGS

  1. Dave Day – “I Want The Right To Be Free” (1979)
  2. Dave Day – “G.I. Blues” (1979)
  3. Dave Day – “Application For Your Love” (1985)
  4. Dave Day – “Stars Shining In The Night” (1985)
  5. Gary Burger – What’s Your Limit (1992)
  6. Dave Day – Having A Party With Dave Havlicek (1994)
  7. Dave Day – “I Want The Right To Be Free” (1997)
  8. Dave Day – “Don’t Ha Ha” (1997)

THE MONKS ARE

  • Gary Burger – lead guitar, lead vocals, tambourine
  • Larry Clark – organ, backing vocals, piano, tambourine
  • Dave Day – banjo, rhythm guitar, banjo guitar, tambourine, backing vocals
  • Roger Johnston – drums, backing vocals
  • Eddie Shaw – bass guitar, backing vocals, trumpet, brass instruments

This is a passion of mine and if one person likes what I do, I’ll feel honored. I like suggestions on what artist to cover next, so if you know of one you’d like me to look at, feel free to suggest ‘em!

Syd Barrett 1971-1974 Stray Tracks Review

Syd Barrett with Stars in 1972

February 16th, 1971 Show for Sounds of the Seventies

The spacious guitar and vocals are beautiful. The “pleases” sound pleading. An announcer says Syd was writing lots of new songs. That appears to be false, so it’s curious where he got that information from. “Love Song” doesn’t get a chance to really take off as this version is shortened for some reason.

“Last Minute Put Together Boogie Band (‘Cambridge’ – January 27th, 1972)”

It’s hard not to love an audience clapping for Syd as he goes on stage. Musically, all you get is a little noodling, probably not even by Syd. Still, this doesn’t hurt to have.

Last Minute Put Together Boogie Band ‎- Six Hour Technicolour Dream Cambridge Show (Only the tracks with Syd) (January 27th. 1972)

Starting “Drinkin’ That Wine” with the singer saying it’s the sort of track you listen to while going to church and getting drunk is a pretty amusing way to start this, perfectly capturing its tone of a bluesy hippie band. “Number Nine” has a great instrumental section. The singer is very soulful, most notably on “Gotta Be A Reason”. Near the end of Reason, the guitar sounds similar to the playing on “Interstellar Overdrive”.

Steve Peregrin Took Tracks, “Molecular Lucky Charm” and “Syd’s Wine”

Syd’s presence is not confirmed. The sound quality is not great, especially for the vocals. The guitar playing and noises create a really solid atmosphere and seem like something Syd would come up with. The entrancing guitar is reminiscent of “Terrapin”. Syd used a lot of tap percussion, like bongos, which Wine has. I think it’s pretty likely Syd is on these. Regardless of the vaSydity, these are interesting psychedelic folk tracks that also feel like T. Rex for obvious reasons.

The 1974 guitar recordings

The 1974 recordings do feature Syd’s proficiency and unique style. While they are obviously incomplete, they do satisfy an itch for those willing to scratch the bottom of the Syd barrel. These prove that Syd still had guitar talent in 1974. These aren’t nearly as directionless as people say. You can detect some care in the playing. These would work as guitar lines of a full song. I wonder who the bassist is. “Boogie #2” has some cool psychedelic guitar playing in the beginning. “If You Go, Don’t Be Slow #1” has particularly warm sounds, though overall there’s sadly too little going on. Most of the tracks could benefit from more to make them last the time they do, but they’re still nice to listen to and not a bad way to spend twenty minutes.

“Boogie #2 (Fragment – Bernard White ‘94 Mix)”

This is too fragmented to get much out of. It’s certainly far less listenable than the original version of this song. The mix doesn’t even sound very different.

“Was That Okay”

This is just Syd saying he thinks something was okay. No music! Of course this is the best track of the lot!

The 1974 recordings with bass and drums added by Richard Hall

A fan version by a Richard Hall adds bass, drums, and minor effects, which brings this to another level, medleying many songs and amplifying the impact they need. Here you get the softer side of Syd’s playing, the jam side, the meaner side. If this album was finished and released at the time, with Syd then retiring, it might be considered a solid and appropriate send off, with him touching on his various eras, while still being extremely solid all the way through.

OVERVIEW

One of the more elusive Syd projects is Stars, a band with bassist Jack Monck and drummer John “Twink” Alder that was only around briefly in 1972. While some of their shows were recorded, none have surfaced. While I wouldn’t turn down any Syd content, these don’t interest me compared to most of his canon because they were playing songs Syd already recorded in studio with Pink Floyd or for his solo work. That is unless there were really some new songs or new sections for old songs. However, we kind of get some Stars material in the above recordings. While the 1971 stuff’s bassist is usually credited to David Gilmour, Monck has also sometimes been. It’s not impossible it really was Monck. The Took recordings probably have Twink on drums (It’s not for certain as Duncan Sanderson is also credited on drums on the compilation album which features them). The closest we get to Stars is the Boogie Band, which has a concert recording where Monck and Twink are on every track, and Syd is on some.

While these later recordings aren’t as approachable as earlier ones, they still are solid, especially in their guitar playing and offer a fascinating final musical chapter for this otherworldly person. For those interested in more artistic expression from Barrett can go to his painting and sculpting. Every bit of Syd is well worth at least a single listen/experience.

Bamboozled (2000) Review

Bamboozled makes itself immediately apparent that it has something to say and a way to say it. The opening scene of Pierre speaking to the audience with his interesting voice in front of what looks like a greenscreen while loud music plays doesn’t leave any room for subtle atmosphere building. It is obviously bombastic. The movie sometimes has long dialogue sequences before something jolting occurs, like a loud musical sequence, as if what we’re seeing is a cold and clinical television studio system with more honest expression sometimes coming out, only to be soon after shut down. Those dialogue sequences are often scored with serious or otherwise attention grabbing music, which evokes the feeling of community theater. Those elements make the film entrancing and memorable in its strangeness.

The look of the film is distinguished in how it’s undistinguished, a little glossy from its digital camera that looks unprocessed and rugged. It doesn’t look very good, to be fair, but it works at showcasing this world as gross and uncomfortable. Scenes like Pierre describing “colored people’s time” goes on longer than you’d think, also showing the same effect of being unnatural and disturbing. It establishes the dynamic where black people’s failings are emphasized or exaggerated by white people, or by black people because of white people. The references to modern media, fashion, etc showcase the dichotomy between that and the idea of a minstrel show. Some even modern tropes if you go back enough are shown to be rooted in minstrel show humor.

The justifications used by white people to say or do the obviously extremely racist things they support use the sort of logic you hear today to justify such things. A character even directly gives those justifications at one point in how negative feedback can be challenged. Methods are suggesting this modern show is better because its cast and crew are really black, acting like critics are taking away viewers’ choice to decide what they watch, acting like critics are demanding power or control, obfuscating what “black” means, calling the show a satire without explaining how, evoking well known black figures, evoking there being a nebulous sense of “community”, and acting like every representation of black people is criticized unfairly, so this shouldn’t be seen as any different. These reasons can be hard to quickly dismantle, but a general issue is that they are sidestepping the nature of what’s being criticized, as well as the arguments by said critics. One particularly amusing moment is when Pierre says that slavery ended four hundred years ago, which is simply false.

The film goes on a little too long given how many scenes hit the same beat of “exposing a social bias” without much to add to that intended message. This isn’t a very significant problem, but one that takes away from the impact more than if the film was punchier, especially as punchy as moments like Pierre’s first scene. About thirty minutes could and should have been cut. At one point, Dunwitty asks Pierre to name a person on his wall. We never see who he’s referring to, which seems strange. Maybe we were supposed to see, but that never got shown for whatever reason?

The character “Big Blak Afrika” describing why he wants his chosen name to be respected is delivered poorly, with the actor almost mumbling. The point of this scene of him isn’t clear, possibly that black people are not beyond being bigoted themselves. That is later shown when some black audience members are the most receptive to the minstrel show. Sloan asking her brother to leave her apartment has really weird hammy acting, with her pointing to the door with both hands. Her character is usually more subtle, so maybe this was intentional? The title screen for Spike Lee’s production company in the last seconds features the phrases “Ya Dig” and “Sho Nuff”.

SPOILERS

Moments like an apparent dream sequence of Pierre beating up Dunwitty for saying the n-word show the frustration minority groups often feel when having to tolerate such behavior. Pierre seemed to have wanted to create his minstrel show to get him fired and to be offensive, but he is later shown defending it. When Pierre’s boss adds in more jokes to the script to make it “funnier”, Pierre complains about how racist they are, as if the point and original concept isn’t already extremely racist. When Womack is exposed to how racist the show will be, he says he’ll need more money. His value system is in effect to a degree, but he is willing to suppress it for money.

Womack seems to understand that what he’s doing is horrible, but when he’s performing as “Sleep ‘n Eat”, he seems enthused and like he likes the material. Pierre and Sloan also seemingly randomly are either supportive or against the show at points. One of the more biting lines in the film is, “I say n**** a hundred times every morning. Keeps my teeth white.” A modern commercial of a group of black people advertising a soda shows some minstrel mannerisms in their behavior. Racism intersecting with sexism is depicted when Sloan is upset at the suggestion that she couldn’t have gotten where she is without sleeping with powerful people.

A scene of a mixed race audience repeatedly using the n-word goes on to the point that the word loses much meaning, reflecting that it only has meaning because culture applies one to it. When Pierre is damage controlling a situation after Manray makes a scene in front of a studio audience, he says horribly racist comments about him, as prejudiced media like this conditions people to think of who is being targeted in a more negative or mockable light. This dehumanization is taken to a more extreme point when video of Manray being murdered is allowed to air on national television, like that sort of behavior against black people is acceptable, at least in a way. A moment of less subtle social commentary is when a group of black criminals are gunned down by the police, while they don’t shoot and only arrest the one white member.

One of the final notes of the movie is when there’s a montage of real anti-black jokes throughout filmed history is shown. The montage shows how unchanging racist imagery can be, with certain patterns emerging. It also suggests they’re recent enough that they were filmed and sometimes in color. The score that plays during it mirrors the earlier scenes of conversations going on long tangents, like how this material becomes numbed in our minds due to its unchanging and cold nature. The somber score plus the subject matter is probably intended to educate those who wouldn’t understand the harm of these depictions, just like how ways of obfuscating racist media was discussed earlier.

Scenes like the commercial for “Timmi Hillnigger” earlier in the film show the materialistic, exploitative, and stereotypical nature of hip hop culture, at least to director Spike Lee, using black people for the purpose of emphasizing a rich white person or depicting black people as something novel to be envious of. “Everybody wanna be a n****, but nobody wanna be a n****.” And why do black people appear and endorse this media? The reason why is because of money. They need it, so they’ll do something like a minstrel show if that means financial stability. That being said, the honest opinion black characters have to racism varies. Why can be debated, but it may be that a young person of modern times wasn’t alive in the most pointed eras of slavery-the 1950s or the desire to fit in with a bigoted culture can make those minority groups be willing to let things slide for the sake of fitting in. They can also honestly not understand the problem. As an example, Pierre doesn’t like his father’s standup material, thinking he’s lost his principles, despite him literally creating and supporting a minstrel show.

OVERVIEW

It seems clear that there is a desire to have your comfort zones challenged. This can be manipulated by those who put out a harmful product and act like those worthwhile “get it”. The masses who don’t really understand it will support it to fit in. This is shown in the film when the minstrel show is called groundbreaking. When Dave Chappelle would actually do satires of racism on his show Chappelle’s Show, he felt people weren’t getting the point and only liking the show when it was making fun of black people on a surface level. There is certainly a lot that can be taken from Bamboozled and it can be especially good for those that may not understand the nature of racism, so this makes fun of some common issues effectively. Another recommendation for this type of movie is The Watermelon Woman.

ON THE CORNER AND OFF THE WALL

For the record, this has been a pretty depressing film to write about. It’s taken a while for me to finish because of its nature, being easier to distract myself with the Three Stooges! It is a worthwhile work, but maybe don’t review it, like I did.

Three Little Beers (1935) Review // The Three Stooges #15

Unfortunately, Three Little Beers continues the trend of mixing some great gags with more mixed ones. The opening and ending, both concerning beer, are far better than the comparatively slow golf scenes. Still, the golf portion isn’t too bad and might’ve worked with more forward momentum. Seeing as this is essentially two shorts, a beer one and a golf one, put together; you’re less invested in the story as it lacks self-consistency. It is a shame this wasn’t about something like trying to transport those beer barrels and seeing how many ways things can go wrong.

There’s as usual many laughs to be had. “What do we have to do?” “Shoot golf.” “Ohhhh, hunting!” Moe goes to eye poke Curly, but a rope is in the way! It’s always great to see one of those barrels of beer hit someone. After seeing some press badges, Curly’s badge says “Pull”. The Three Stooges’ mindless counting, and Curly’s quip that follows are similarly sharp. Some of the issues of the series are more prominent than they have been. It’s sometimes extremely obvious that an image of a background is used instead of a real one. Something like the dummies in Hoi Polloi work better because of the unexpected humor of it, which isn’t present here. How did the Stooges get press badges? Curly’s cartoonish noises and body language have become very annoying. It’s a shame he doesn’t get new ones more than he does. They often feel forced in. They could’ve been replaced with something like a Larry scene.

SPOILERS

Curly once again channels Harpo Marx by pointlessly stealing. This would be more forgiving if he was doing a particularly original joke. It’d make more sense for Moe or Larry to be performing petty theft as Moe might want something he doesn’t have and think he could get away with taking it or the lack of Larry scenes could be used to suggest that he gets up to this sort of thing when offscreen, which would be pretty amusing. One joke that doesn’t make much sense, but is still funny is when Moe is hitting the golf balls and those being hit by them lie down. It seems what’s probably supposed to be happening is they’re either knocked unconscious or are trying to dodge them. The 180 degree rule breaking doesn’t help. Curly doing his laundry is also odd, but has that “delightfully offbeat” nature.

The short gets a lot better at the end when the gang are at war with the beer barrels. There’s lots of great little moments, like when the barrels roll up a hill, as if destined to be an inconvenience for the team. A barrel at one point hits a rock and flies in the air and hits Larry, who is in a tree. The best of these films is when these glorious bizarre and nonsensical bits occur. There was a point near the beginning where I thought Curly would have a barrel burst on his head, but it didn’t happen. Fortunately, that does at the end.

OVERVIEW

We apparently don’t actually see the contest the leads want to compete in, it’s as if there was a script about golfing which featured the contest, but that was removed for the sake of the beer scenes. That could’ve given more of a focus to these proceedings instead of suffering from the mindlessness of this installment. Still, that’s not such a big deal, especially considering the positives. If this whole short was as strong as the “beer scenes”, it’d be one of the best. As is, it’s solid enough, but wastes obvious potential. Still, it’s definitely a worthwhile installment for the fatal glasses of beer.

Hoi Polloi (1935) Review // The Three Stooges #14

A frame from the short

Hoi Polloi is considered a classic Three Stooges short. For better and for worse, it has a fast pace, so that keeps things punchy, but there’s little room to settle in. This sometimes adds charm. It’s so amusing how fast the premise is established, in a break-neck conversation at the beginning. These shorts don’t mess around! Unfortunately, there’s pretty quickly a time jump instead of us more gradually seeing the Stooges become gentlemen. Harry Holman as Professor Richmond losing his temper would be a lot funnier if there were scenes of him trying to compose himself. Still, moments like that still work well enough as presented.

Favorite moments are when Moe hits Larry, who did nothing, “just in case he says something”. Later there’s, “What happened? You’re all canned up! Woo, woo, woo.” Smack! Moe kicking the bottle, and the chaos it causes. Larry gets a good scene where he is looking for his shoe. While Curly is confidently oafish and Moe doesn’t believe himself to be oafish, Larry knows he is but isn’t confident about it. As is typical, he gets less material than the others.

Is there shaving cream in a cup in the middle of this party? If so, why? Curly randomly deciding to shave is strange, but humorous due to how out of the blue it is, especially with a more stubborn hair coming out being scored to a cello string plucking. Some of the unbelievable ways that things go wrong make a little more sense if you imagine a force in the universe of the Three Stooges that causes absurdities to happen as often as possible. They’re vehicles of failure. The contrast between them and “high society” punctuates their outsider nature.

SPOILERS

The woman with the bee in her dress deciding to jump out a window makes no sense, but it’s funny, especially because why would any of them jump out the window? We could stretch and say the woman only fell out, but then why would the Stooges endanger themselves, even if they thought it was part of the dance? Somehow, the use of dummies adds a lot to the offbeat nature of gags like this and makes for a stronger effect than if they looked life-like enough to pass as real people. Such a moment was almost certainly done for cost reasons and not artistic ones.

Curly hasn’t been known to steal, so why would he? Seems he was briefly possessed by Harpo Marx! Seeing as Moe wanted to not make a scene, why would he stick his finger in the sofa? This would make more sense with Larry, being so awkward he needs something to hold and ground him. Also, it’s pretty obvious he’s not really stuck. It might seem weird why Curly’s dance partner slaps him for falling down, obviously not on purpose. It works as foreshadowing for our heroes doing what they do best, creating more Stooges. Everyone eventually becomes ridiculous and hits each other around in a Stooge-like manner. While it is reasonably well handled, it would’ve been better to have more foreshadowing, like scenes where the guests are agitated more and more that they’re prone to lashing out. You’re left wondering why most of them became violent.

OVERVIEW

The final joke is very funny, fortunately not feeling like an afterthought, unlike some. A Buster Keaton trope is for shorts to end with him as an older man, well after the time of the given episode. Some of the Three Stooges installments would make more sense with such a scene, because that would explain why the shorts often end so suddenly. It’d also work as a Chekhov’s gun, with Curly’s bizarre antics or some plot element managing to creep up in some unsuspecting manner. The group’s first Columbia short, Woman Haters, does indeed depict them as old men at the end. Hoi Polloi continues to straighten out those kinks and delivers a more satisfying watch as is, but due to things like pacing issues, it can stand to improve.

Pink Floyd 1971-1977 Stray Tracks Review

Pink Floyd 1973

Pink Floyd released the equivalent of one album a year in the years 1967, 1968, and 1970. They did the equivalent of three in 1969. They were managing similar amounts of material in the first three mentioned years as 1969, but just not releasing a lot of it, or at least not on their main albums. This changed in 1971. For starters, they started putting more time in developing what got on their albums and the albums became more acclaimed and culturally significant. Thus, you’d think that the strays would be at least very solid, especially considering how few there were. Note that a few times I had so little to say that I wrote on more than one track at once.

“Pink Blues” aka “Blues”

This is one of the more concentrated pieces, having very good interplaying. The power and energy causes “Blues” to continuously build momentum.

“Corrosion in the Pink Room”

Has some pleasant atmosphere, but is very unfocused. It features some of the band’s trademarks, creepy keyboard, stuttering cymbals designed to create a large backing, and Roger’s vocalizing. These tropes are a little too stale for the track’s good. The keys aren’t too bad, though.

“Mortality Sequence” & ““La Vallee” – Instrumental”

These are amusing enough experiments, but do feel like a joke. There’s a lot of nonsense sounds, like AI generated Pink Floyd. The section without the vocalizing on Mortality isn’t too bad.

“The Hard Way”

A pleasant and extremely incomplete experiment. “The Hard Way” has a nice groove and diversity in sound, but doesn’t go anywhere. Wouldn’t be bad on a noise album, but not so much on a Floyd one, except for one problem. Despite being so short, it’s pretty repetitive.

“On The Run (outtake)” & “The Travel Sequence”

These are fun, but once again directionless and feeling like no one knows what’s going on. They have an infectious sense of fun and rhythm, so they’re worth listening to, but were rightfully not put on an album.

“pink floyd unreleased track 1973” (4:14) aka “Flanger”

This sounds like a test. “Hey Nick, play a little so we can see if the recorder is working.” Still, a little drumming isn’t the worst thing in the world. This is like the Pink Floyd version of the Beach Boys track, “Denny’s Drums”.

“Mexico 70”

Can’t believe how many of these tracks have random noises in them. There’s some nice guitar noodling, but it goes on forever doing the same thing. It’s easy to imagine this could’ve been worked on more and included on an album. Maybe on Wish You Were Here to demonstrate Syd going mad? Faneditors, get on that.

“Wine Glasses”

This is pretty, but inessential on its own. Of course, it would be used to great effect on “Shine On You Crazy Diamond” in a better form.

“You’ve Got To Be Crazy”

Roger’s vocal is really flat, sounding like a demo. Of course that can be forgiven due to this obviously being a work-in-progress not intended for release. The playing isn’t too bad, though falters in some ways. That’s something that could be fixed with more rehearsing. Lyrics like “Sometimes it seems as if I’m just being used” are way too heavy handed. The released version on Animals is very solid.

“Raving and Drooling”

This one starts with what sounds like the Doctor Who theme. This track is especially fun due to the punk-esque nature of its riffs and intensity.

“Message From The Sheep (Field Recording)”

Just some sheep baaing.

“Drift Away Blues”

This takes a little from “Pink Blues”. David gets to show off a little with his guitar playing, with a little bit of fun moments for Rick and Nick, but as previously stated it’s something that should’ve been incorporated in a more rehearsed and fleshed out album if at all. The aforementioned “Pink Blues” is better due to being short and sweet.

OVERVIEW

Despite being known for their innovation, Pink Floyd often got stuck in formulas. Fortunately, that stuff generally got unreleased around the start of the early 70s, with much better material properly getting on the albums. A super fan should listen to these tracks just for the sake of it, but a casual fan can live without what amounts to mostly live fiddling. Still, there are a few gems.

Pardon My Scotch (1935) Review // The Three Stooges #13

While the pacing and structure can be off putting because as is typical, some gags happen in a certain setting, such as construction here, with the leads being construction workers doing construction jokes, then the plot suddenly moves to something else, like bartending, with little rhyme or reason, like random jokes written for different projects were tossed into this short; that’s all easy to forgive in Pardon My Scotch, as it’s just so extremely funny.

The Three Stooges get fun wordplay, like when they say “Left” or “Right”, to affirm a command or as direction. Moe is glorious in full form as a lovable asshole, like when the group, standing opposing, point to each of their right side and Moe gets mad they aren’t pointing to his right. Moe gets more to do than he has, instead of Curly getting the focus. Here, Moe even has more material than Curly. It’s so much fun seeing Moe condescend to Curly, feeling he’s so much dumber, especially when he tries to be nice. His frustrated facial expressions are priceless, like after he thinks he got Curly to understand him. Larry sadly doesn’t get much to do.

The scene of Moe falling after a table is cut in half is one of the more famous gags, looking really painful and actually really hurting the real life Moe. It’s very impressive how much these guys went through to get laughs. It’s hard to imagine how this gag could’ve gone safely for Moe or that he would’ve knowingly hurt himself like that. As a whole, the construction scene is one of the finest slapstick scenes in the whole series so far, with the gang running around finding new and creative ways to create glorious hilarious violent havoc for each other.

There’s even a particularly cute drawing of the gang during the title card. The look of the drink the group is making changes constantly between shots, such as being more or less full. “I’ll marry him if there’s enough dough in it.” Curly has made a habit of saying slightly gay things.

SPOILERS

The group randomly deciding to destroy Billy Gilbert’s performance is more of a Marx Brothers thing to do, being crass in polite society for the sake of it, but the Stooges are the type to be funny by intending to be polite themselves, but failing so beautifully. That being said, this light moment of them choosing chaos deliberately is so charming and well executed that it is another highlight of the series. We’re just seeing them kick back and blatantly being the kooks they are. A favorite moment is when Curly awards the others a trophy, which Moe then smashes over his head. The scene continues to be heavenly with the hysterical and straight delivery of, “What are you trying to make for me? A fruit salad? Pigs!” He then slips on a banana. After you think the scene will then die down, Moe throws a pineapple at him, Gilbert has left the room, but the pineapple defies physics and goes after him. His offscreen scream is also great.

Things sadly do die down, being a little slower before the finale. The ending sequence is too fast. A little more time and ways for things to go wrong would make the ultimate explosion more humorous. Things then end a little too suddenly, with Moe just hitting the others a little.

OVERVIEW

Despite some minor critiques, Pardon My Scotch is so stuffed with great jokes it has to be the best of the series so far, even with slight drag around the end. Even something like the ending, while having problems, still delivers gags solid enough to keep you laughing. It also epitomizes the short. At the end of the day, Moe will avoid his own faults and instead just smack around Larry and Curly; his sometimes and real brother.

My cameo in the film

The Thing (1982) Review

Kurt Russell as MacReady

The Thing is rightfully considered a great atmospheric horror movie that strives in showcasing the insanity of human beings in these sorts of stressful situations, with the otherworldly terror here adding a new layer to the dread. The movie establishes its slow creepiness from the get go, with the opening titles being white text on a black background, with the sound initially silent before music slowly starts. The acting is mostly very good, as is the tense dialogue. The characterization is a little token at points and the effects are mixed. Some of the effects are fantastic, while others don’t hold up, looking too much like dummies or sculptures. Some of the bad ones are prominent enough that their faults are easy to spot, when the movie could’ve been careful to mask them.

Many of the characters are more muted than I originally thought in previous viewings. A notable example is Keith David as Childs, who is relatively uninvolved. Many of the others just serve as fodder to make you wonder if they’re the thing or not. Thomas G. Waites as Windows is the weakest actor, notably when complaining about not being able to get in contact with anyone, not that his performance is so bad as to sink the movie. A scene of Nauls and Windows shouting comes off a little comical due to the lack of other noises. Perhaps the actors thought there’d be more noise added in post, so it’d make sense for them to be as loud as they are?

The opening shot of the arctic is handheld and rugged, looking like documentary footage. That mirrors the general discomfort we’re supposed to have with this closed off and unloved space, where it’d be dangerous to even go outside for a long period of time. The core of the movie is Kurt Russell as R. J. MacReady. He gets the most focus in the story, despite not being very strongly defined. He for the most part seems to have a moral compass, though he is in some ways very unlikable. There doesn’t seem to be much reason why he is the main character due to him not having much more insight or significance throughout the story than the others, other than at points being considered the leader.

SPOILERS

The Norwegian seemingly was going to throw a grenade at the dog, which may have resulted in people being killed. That would cause the others to distrust him. There’s a shot of someone trying to find the grenade after it’s dropped. That was probably left in by mistake. It could be explained as there being a second person that was in the helicopter that got out to get the grenade. How did MacReady understand the danger of the thing before he went to where the dogs were? Him hearing their barking seemed to be what was supposed to have caused that.

MacReady shooting Clark and a dog makes him hard to like when the movie wants you to. They sink him to at best careless and at worst malevolent. Moments like the others wanting to trap him outside in the desperate cold seem to exist to get you on his side, but if we’re supposed to be then why include his moments of cruelty? Any potential commentary intended about him is so easy to miss it might not even be there or be intended. The scene of the Bennings-Thing screaming is rightfully an iconic moment, bathed in an uncomfortable dark mood, especially with the creature eventually being lit ablaze, creating illumination. Clark witnessing the murdered dogs is very impactful, with us feeling his pain. However, this character and his story doesn’t get resolved. He ultimately is killed unceremoniously by MacReady. It would’ve made more sense for MacReady to have killed all the dogs, so Clark later trying to jump him would be retaliation.

The Norris-Thing is another special effects highlight, especially seeing the head separate and try to run away. Just before, Copper losing his arms doesn’t look very realistic. Later on, Windows’ death scene makes for probably the worst special effect, with the use of a dummy being extremely obvious. When MacReady says they all won’t make it out alive, the others don’t seem very phased in response. The movie could’ve included some foreshadowing to this, like if the characters he talked to were either shown to be eager to return home and see their families or were carefree and willing to do dangerous things, something for MacReady’s line to follow.

There doesn’t seem to be much point to who dies and when, save for MacReady making it to the end. At the point where it’s just him, Garry, and Nauls; it being them would make more sense if they had a specific bond established. Maybe they exceptionally disliked each other, but now have an understanding and are content to work together? Garry and Nauls are soon killed off with little fanfare. Some of the characters, like Windows and Nauls before their deaths, made really dumb decisions. Characters like the two mentioned and Clark have deaths that seem crammed in, like they were forgotten about in the script, then at the last second their deaths were written in. Thus, the pacing and stakes are janky, with certain things being established, like Blair going mad slowly and Garry being a good marksman, only for the movie to end with a succession of progressively faster and meaningless kills that negate much point to the cast. There’s little reaction to someone these people have personally known dying. Other deaths like Norris’ and Bennings’ are necessary and they work well because of that.

MacReady is ultimately proven to be a terrible leader. The movie glorifies him a little, such as with him being the focal point, being the one to defeat the thing, and ultimately surviving to the end. When the others think he’s been replaced with the thing, we’re supposed to want him to make it. However, by the end of the movie everyone except him and Childs explicitly dies, sometimes by MacReady. They might have been better off getting a competent leader or letting MacReady freeze to death. There’s not even much reason to think that he successfully destroyed the thing. It’s suspected and not contradicted that any piece of a thing that escapes destruction could grow and reform. It’s likely some of it could’ve escaped the burning base, especially because the thing can survive in the cold. Considering the enormity of having to destroy every molecule of the thing, how could anyone ever hope to kill it? There’s also some tension as to whether or not Childs is really the thing, with MacReady seeming to think that’s possible. That being said, MacReady earlier in the movie saying that if everyone except him was a thing, they’d all just kill him could potentially be foreshadowing for this ending, with Childs being still human as if he wasn’t he’d kill MacReady.

The ending is best left ambiguous. The lack of resolution creates for a poignant and impactful takeaway, though it is a little annoying for those invested in what will happen next and if the thing was really destroyed or not. A lot of endings you could imagine might have plot holes, such as the aforementioned unlikelihood of truly killing every last bit of the thing. It’s best to be able to imagine your own resolution. If you are to take any of the sequel media as canon, then MacReady explicitly failed to destroy the thing, which is unsatisfying due to all that was sacrificed for him to perhaps accomplish that.

OVERVIEW

Due to things like character dynamics not coming to much and some plot contrivances, this movie isn’t as flawless as it is to some, including myself the first time I watched it. I thought I’d like it more on a repeat, but alas. Despite the criticisms, the mystery, tension, performances, among other aspects rightly push this movie to the level of “classic”. I recommend The Thing to all, as most would.

It’s easy to imagine an alternate universe where Russell returned for sequel after sequel, which expands on what the thing is and his character, with a fan favorite The Things and an unloved CGI-fest The Thing: 2000.

Uncivil Warriors (1935) Review // The Three Stooges #12

Despite a very strong premise, Uncivil Warriors needs some time to get started. It starts a little slow. The Stooges have generally been funnier with outsiders to work off of, while the opening here mostly shows them bouncing off each other. This story would make sense as part of a Three Stooges feature film, where the setup would be very short in comparison to all the scenes that carry along the humor and narrative. As is, it feels too slow.

Moe and Larry get far too little to do, especially in the beginning. Scenes that incorporate all three Stooges are some of the best. A little after the five minute mark, Moe gets to be his grouchy self and it reminds you that he wasn’t very defined this short until then. It’s great seeing things like the group dressing their voices or changing their body language in an attempt to trick someone. Larry seems to get the bare minimum of said moments, or scenes in general. Larry, as well as Curly, dress up at one point in some of the sharpest moments of the short. Larry does well with what he’s given, so it’s a shame he didn’t get more. There’s closeups and interjections of Moe and Curly eating the cake a-plenty, while Larry is almost forgotten about, getting far fewer.

Bud Jamison as General Buttz interacts with the gang well, often being oblivious to their idiocy and strangely trusting of them, for great comedic effect. Maybe he’s only like that for plot laziness, but it fortunately has value for laughs. The joke about Charlie and how he walks is good, with some nice little touches such as with the gun. That gag was used in the Harold Lloyd film Feet First. A highlight is when Curly tricks Buttz by taking a piece of paper and pretending to burn it by accident. It is a little weird as it portrays a Stooge as smart. At one point, Curly says a dumb joke to someone and preemptively covers his face, used to getting hit by Moe. Later, Larry gets a great line after, “Pardon me, how long have you had a weak back?” “Oh, ‘bout a week back.”

There’s a scene of Curly lighting a smoke that goes on forever. Who needed this? Curly’s wooing and ‘victim of circumstance’ line comes off incredibly forced and stale. They really aren’t needed here, only really working when they did several shorts ago due to being unexpected and quirky, which they no longer are. The editing as always has issues, and they’ll be discussed more in…

SPOILERS

The interspersing of closeups of the group coughing up feathers feels so random and careless, showcasing the poor editing of these films. This problem is worse at the start of the scene, cutting from Moe with the others to a closeup to the previous shot, with this then being repeated a few times. A gag like that might’ve sounded great on paper, but this sort of execution is so haphazard that you can’t settle on it and get the right impact, being more focused on how strange it’s edited. That being said, it is very amusing seeing the feathers spray out their mouths, like fountains.

Where did Moe get a baby from? How did he not realize they were the wrong color? More laughs include, “Do you know what that paper was?” “Hot!” At one point, Curly says a joke off camera and we hear the slap he receives. The final joke is solid, but the short ends so suddenly that you have to believe there was a deleted scene after. There’s also no resolution to the plot. How did the leads back at base go? There could’ve been some fun jokes there.

OVERVIEW

Reference is made to an Operator 13 that isn’t seen. Apparently this is a reference to the movie Operator 13, which stars and is titled after Marion Davies’ character. A comic adaptation of this short demonstrates the character as an attractive blonde, which may very well be modeled after Davies. Thus, Uncivil Warriors should be considered canon by Davies aficionados.