Category Archives: Media: Charlie Chaplin

Tillie’s Punctured Romance (1914) Review

Chaplin in the end (of the beginning)

Tillie’s Punctured Romance is a historically significant film. It’s the first feature length comedy ever and it’s also the last Charlie Chaplin at Keystone film when ordered by release date. It is a pretty epic way to tie him off. Those watching every Chaplin film can see this as a finale to this era. Functionally, the film has a lot of Keystone elements, but now things take longer to progress and the story escalates. Sometimes the movie will seem like a more typical comedy before Keystone antics break out, like when bricks suddenly start being thrown. There’s some filler that is very similar to the types of things viewers would be familiar with. There’s scenes of Tillie, Charlie Chaplin, and Mabel Normand walking around being silly. We deal with things like someone getting drunk for the first time and someone in a hurry to run away from where a problem is.

Despite the filler, the film has a decent pace and isn’t too boring. Keystone two-reelers are often more tedious, as if they had one-reel of material and stretched it out. The main benefit of Tillie is that you’re always curious what will happen next. This studio has functioned as an idea box of sorts and plenty are used here. Some of the “ideas” thrown at the cast aren’t what you would expect. Even if they are, they’re still in a journey that satisfies, even though probably for only one viewing. The main negative is that if you don’t find the studio funny, all you have is the story and characters. They’re alright enough, but they don’t make a strong impact. There are more dialogue scenes than you might expect. They aren’t too bad, but it would’ve been ideal to have fewer of them. They are unexpected as they focus on the main characters in a way that often develops them. It’s nice to see that even the first feature comedy can understand that it’s important to care about the characters.

The two female leads, Mabel Normand and Marie Dressler, make weak impressions. Dressler is particularly similar to Chaplin’s weaker moments of always managing to make messes and be a little too clumsy and dumb to be approachable. Charlie Chaplin is much better, having an aura of confidence and a seductive nature, only to be far weaker and pathetic underneath. It helps that he seems to be getting the best scenes. There’s a great bit where he’s nervous and starts picking at his cane, taking it apart. Chaplin as always is great at falling in a funny way. Charlie is someone you can love to hate. When Tillie accidentally steps on Charlie’s foot after a few occurrences of her accidentally hurting him, he raises his cane, as if to strike her. There’s a scene where a woman upsets Charlie. He goes to backhand her and a cop nearby laughs. Charlie is quick to seduce Tillie, with the latter seeming a little uncomfortable. She’s easily won over. While the romance is obviously underdeveloped, the movie doesn’t put much importance in it, so it’s excusable. It’s arguably part of the joke how fast they decide to wed.

The warm lighting and pretty shots make this one of the better directed Chaplin at Keystone films. Other favorite moments are Mabel’s introduction where she walks up to the camera; a shot of Mabel in front of a street, with us seeing the camera capture down the road; and a slightly shadow-covered policeman being filmed with a low angle, making him seem more intimidating. Charlie Chaplin’s introduction of his back to the camera before turning around looks pretty snazzy and would’ve been a fantastic way to introduce him in his first film. The editing is better than the shorts, but still could use some work.

There’s a scene in front of a movie theater where all the background posters are for Keystone films. The film within a film, A Thief’s Fate, is hilariously cheesy. A man finds a note that fell off a girl that reveals she has money and her family had to work very hard for it. At a party, it appears a man flirts with Charlie. It’s hard to interpret him as something other than a coded queer. There’s a few big fight scenes of varying levels of relevance to the story. They all feel like they were included as it’s such a staple of Keystone. They’re fine enough, with the very last one being kind of cute. They at least look better than a lot of the ones in shorts. They don’t feel very natural to the story, with there not being much build up. Only one is particularly annoying due to it in a way substituting for better character moments.

SPOILERS

When Charlie sees Tillie’s father hide a large sum of money, he leaves to the other room and closes the door. While this isn’t of consequence in the movie, if he actually closed the door in real life, he would be revealing through the sound that he saw the money. When Tillie is upset at a restaurant, surrounding men try to calm her down. Why would they care? After Tillie is arrested, she conveniently has rich relatives who bail her out. It’s funny when in the movie within a movie, the female accomplice of the thief extends her arms and yells when she’s arrested. She also laughs like an over the top villain.

Tillie applies for a job. Does she have a place to live? She has no money, so how could she? One of the funniest moments is when Charlie discovers that Tillie has inherited a fortune from her uncle in a newspaper. He hurries to Tillie to marry her. He gets down on his knees on the wet ground and manages to make a mess. Tillie marries him. Her doing so doesn’t make sense due to how poorly he treated her before. Also, the newspaper said she was the only heir, yet her father was shown to be alive. Later, Tillie decides to kill Charlie for cheating and starts firing at him, often in crowds. It’s a shame that this very out of the blue element is happening instead of something that deals more with the characters’ established emotions and arcs. Tillie keeps having pretty clear shots to hit Charlie and then either doesn’t shoot or doesn’t hit. She appears to forgive Charlie briefly, only to get mad at him right after.

There’s a 180 degree rule break with Tillie firing at Charlie and Mabel. It’s also obvious that the mansion and the dock are two very different areas, yet the editing suggests they’re right next to each other. It seems the uncle really being alive didn’t add anything. You’d think that would be what scared Charlie away, but that instead happens because he was caught cheating. Also, no one made sure the uncle was dead? There is no final joke, with the very last scene light on humor. While the lack of humor is a shame, the positives of the film really play into it as it is cathartic to see Tillie and Mabel both break up with Charlie and hug, as if they’ve gotten over either committing crimes and/or getting upset over things like Charlie. This scene would work far less if the characters were written worse.

OVERVIEW

It probably wouldn’t be hard to make a fifty-minute cut of this eighty-minute film without anything seeming missing. The film also suffers due to the lack of good jokes. The movie has a nice enough story for when you want something like this, but it stretches out its small few novelties until about breaking point. Without Charlie Chaplin, the lack of a good performance might push the movie to being unwatchable. While Chaplin from basically the beginning of his career was giving good performances, he sometimes had times where he seemed to be phoning it in. Even when he was trying, it sometimes wasn’t for the best film. Sadly very few of the thirty-five surviving are worth a viewing. It seems Chaplin understood that as he kept making fewer and fewer films a year until 1920 where he made zero. After that it was once in a while. The good and/or worthwhile Chaplin at Keystone films are Making a Living, Mabel’s Strange Predicament, The Star Boarder, Twenty Minutes of Love, Caught in a Cabaret, A Busy Day, The Face on the Barroom Floor, and The Masquerader. Tillie’s Punctured Romance doesn’t make the list, but wouldn’t be too bad a watch in addition to the others.

A cute dog that made this cameo in the film

His Prehistoric Past (1914) Review // The Tramp #25

Chaplin in the film

One of the reasons I wanted to watch every Charlie Chaplin film was to see how many of them were Tramp films. His Prehistoric Past is the second last Chaplin at Keystone and I know the last one has no Tramp in it. Thus, Prehistoric is the last of this era of Trampage. You could perhaps call this the end of the Tramp season 1. It’s been an interesting journey going through all these. The Tramp isn’t vicious or violent for the most part here. He acts like someone who just wants his girl and is also a bit of an asshole. That being said, there’s one point where the Tramp is surrounded by women, a man takes them all, and the Tramp hits him for them back. There are other violent moments, but they seem to be coming from him wanting to just have what he wants and be left alone. He doesn’t pick fights.

Miscellaneous comments include: There’s a funny moment where Mack Swain pulls out a club, as if to hit someone, but then seems to change his mind and puts it away. One actor keeps looking at the camera and it’s very annoying. The inside of Mack’s hut looks weird. It’s obviously not rock. Is it supposed to be? It would’ve been better if this short being a dream was a twist at the end, not a set up for the story. The ending would be more surprising.

I wonder if it was felt that simply having this story be set in prehistoric times was too much for audiences to grasp. There are cases where a fantasy or film with unrealistic elements, like The Wizard of Oz, is made to be a dream as it’s believed the audience couldn’t buy it otherwise. That being said, seeing as none of these Keystone films have been realistic, this might be hard to believe. Maybe a way of reconciling the earlier violent Tramp with the later kinder Tramp is that the kind Tramp dreamed any film where he was violent? It appears that in the seconds of Prehistoric set in the modern day, he gets mistreated. The Tramp also doesn’t do any wrongdoing in those moments.

You could take this as a character moment for the Tramp. Either he’s so violent in real life that all his dreams have that in them, even if he seems to be trying to escape it, or if the violent shorts are dreams, then it’s a power fantasy for him. If you watch a film like, The Star Boarder, then imagining him dreaming a violent short makes sense give or take.

SPOILERS

There’s a handful of good gags. One is where a man lifts the Tramp’s animal hide and intends to poke him in the butt. However, he revealed his presence in doing this and is thus kicked by the Tramp. Later, The Tramp and two others slowly move around a rock, trying to get the one in front of them. There’s a nice meandering score for this part, as if building up suspense. There’s a title card that reads, “They Exchange Cards”. The Tramp and Mack have amusing responses to reading the leaves, as if they’re business cards. The Tramp goes to hit someone over the head for taking the girls, then we cut before the club reaches his head to the Tramp where he was before with the girls again.

You’d think the Tramp could tell the women that were around him left without him needing to open his eyes. There’s a scene where the Tramp gets caught in the water. Were we supposed to fear he could drown? It’s a pretty random thing that of course isn’t plot relevant! In the seconds of time after the Tramp wakes up from his dream, he is apparently badgered by a cop. Someone’s really trying to throw this in every film, aren’t they? It’d be interesting to see if Keystone filmmakers (and also those on early Hal Roach) hated the police.

OVERVIEW

It wouldn’t be surprising that the reason the Tramp would later be more likable is so we can want him to win. Those films make good use of utilizing the character’s down points to get him to be sympathized with. The goal is to have a developed story, which needs developed characters. It’s easier to achieve the “goal” of these early shorts, to get laughs, with someone so comically unsocial and unlikable. It’d fascinate to see the alternate universe of Chaplin where he maintained the “the Tramp is a horrible person” element and still made movies seen as masterpieces. Perhaps he tells John from The Kid to not respect authority and how to get with women? To be honest, those ideas don’t seem that funny, but maybe a genius could’ve figured it out? Even the villainous Chaplin roles don’t manage to stay fresh for all these films. That might be because of the generally poor quality of them.

Despite the handful of good gags, most of His Prehistoric Past isn’t something you’d get much out of unless you were a Chaplin super fan. That sums up most of the Keystone films nicely. Based on the sorts of premises they have, it’s not hard to have at least an odd good joke, but as a whole they are repetitive.

Getting Acquainted (1914) Review // The Tramp #24

Chaplin in his death

Of the late in the day Chaplin at Keystone films, this has the weakest directing, looking very flat. The park setting doesn’t help. I couldn’t believe that this film had the same cast and location as His Trysting Place. You could believe both films come from the same recording day. Wikipedia calls the Tramp, “Mr. Sniffles” here, though such a name isn’t in the film. Seeing as he was called “Mr. Wow-Wow” in another, I’d like to think one is his mother’s name and the other his father’s. In all seriousness, seeing as it’s not in the movie, it’s BANISHED! The Tramp looks at Cecile Arnold’s butt for a second before looking away. Would be interesting to know if Chaplin got distracted for a second. The Tramp is portrayed give or take at his creepiest and most predatory here. This isn’t the first time he does something that’s simply very unlikable. It’s hard to tell if the joke is that he’s a horrible person for doing what he does or that the woman on the receiving end isn’t into it.

Mabel Normand and Mack Swain got a decent amount of material and thus opportunities to be funny. However, they seem to be going through the motions. Chaplin is a little, but there is a bit of a spark. No one seems to really have their heart here, as if this was just something everybody wanted to get out of the way as soon as possible. The camera is strangely high up in one scene, so there’s a lot of dead space at the top of the frame. A policeman walks from one frame to another, but based on where he left the first frame, he wouldn’t have arrived where he did in the second. There’s a scene where someone throws something at someone, but because of bad editing we don’t see the person get hit. The cop overacts quite a bit.

As has been a staple, that policeman is stupid, clumsy, and violent. The “They Get Acquainted” title card is funny. It’s a little unexpected and clever. The best acting moment is when a dazed Tramp lifts his hat with a mindless face, as if he is running on mental autopilot and wants to lift his hat to be polite. I’m curious to know what the Tramp sees in Phyllis Allen’s character. The same goes to Mack Swain when he was married to her in His Trysting Place.

SPOILERS

The Tramp quite brazenly hits on Mabel. He does a trick in order to touch her arm and try to kiss her. Possibly by accident, the Tramp lifts his cane with it caught in Mabel’s skirt, so we see some 1910s lady leg. Scandalous! The Tramp continuingly and poorly tries to get with Mabel while she’s consistently saying no. This includes him touching her. Mabel doesn’t hit the Tramp in response, instead trying to get help. She acts like all she wants is to avoid conflict. Perhaps she’s afraid that if she tried violently escaping him, he’d get violent in response. This feels somewhat realistic and thus not funny. Admittedly, it wouldn’t have been funny even if they were being goofy.

Mack is similarly creepy and handsy. It seems like he didn’t know Phyllis would have a problem with him touching her without permission. The men don’t seem to mind the other being grabby with their wife, which makes sense as they were doing the same thing. Near the end, the couples briefly and seemingly become friends for no reason. Based on Keystone logic, you think they’d be fighting each other. One of the best gags is when the Tramp sneaks up behind the policeman and pulls on his leg with his cane.

OVERVIEW

Sexual Harrassment: The Movie is definitely one of the least interesting or worthwhile of this series. Beyond it making light of sexual harassment, it just doesn’t have many good moments and it’s more sloppily put together than other Chaplin films made around this time. It’s more in tune with the earlier installments. It’s similar to Recreation, though at least that one had the good graces to be six minutes instead of fourteen. Thank Fanny Getting Acquainted wasn’t a two-reeler. As this is the last Mabel and the Tramp film, I propose a timeline of their various encounters: Mabel’s Strange Predicament, Mabel’s Busy Day, A Film Johnnie, Caught in a Cabaret, The Fatal Mallet, Getting Acquainted, Gentlemen of Nerve, Mabel’s Married Life, and finally His Trysting Places. Fortunately, it seems this dysfunctional romance didn’t last too long.

His Trysting Place (1914) Review // The Tramp #23

Chaplin in the Mabel

His Trysting Place easily could’ve been a one-reeler. The main story starts halfway through. A lot of the first half isn’t necessary, though it’s not too unpleasant. It’s surprising this short was considered worthy of being two reels considering how little there is. The Tramp and Mabel Normand are married again. Their relationship is generally portrayed as dysfunctional. The Tramp once again does things that aren’t grounded or connectable, and thus are not relatable or very funny. One is giving his son a gun to play with, seemingly not understanding how dangerous that is. Much of his humor is predictable. Chaplin’s improved directorial style remains, though the same ol’ same ol’ of bars and parks has gotten quite old.

Sometimes Mabel can overact and other times not. At one point, she’s upset and is heightened, but it feels like she comes from something real. In little time, she’s gesticulating far too comically. If her movements were better thought out, less would be more. Mabel does many Tramp-esque things. Just like him, she unthinkingly gets water spilled. She throws something at him when she’s upset. When Mabel finds the baby with the gun, she doesn’t do anything comedic or unexpected, she acts close to how a normal person would… and that’s not funny. This is supposed to be a goofy comedy! The middle between normal and hyper wacky is the sweet spot here.

The Tramp gets a moment to be violent, where over basically nothing he gets in a fight with someone and makes a big scene. This sort of thing would fit a lot better in the older shorts, especially because of how little it takes to provoke him. That fight scene is, however, quite good. It’s like the Tramp has had so much practice getting into fights at places like this that he knows what to do to win them. The Tramp is generally not that violent this short.

Mack Swain makes a weak impression and Phyllis Allen makes a negative one due to her overacting. Note her facial expressions. At one point, the baby is wrapped in a blanket and is obviously not really in the blanket. Why not put a doll in it so it looks like something is actually there? Later, Mack is clearly holding the baby-blanket differently between shots, as if he swapped from having his head on his left arm to his right. The Tramp looks at a crumpled up piece of paper, but it’s not crumpled when we get a closeup of it for the audience.

SPOILERS

Why would Mabel give the baby back after how grossly he was handled by the Tramp? She doesn’t notice him holding him just as recklessly as before. One of the funniest moments is when the Tramp nonchalantly eats a stranger’s food in front of him and wipes his hands on his beard. That minor player is great, having a look of disbelief on his face. Another great bit is when the Tramp uses a handkerchief and sets it down. Someone moves it, he goes for it again and feels around and can’t find it for obvious reasons. That’s a gag you could miss when watching! Earlier, there’s an intertitle that says, “He takes the wrong coat”. It’s a shame we didn’t get a visual way of learning this.

Despite the Tramp and Mabel making up over the main issue by the end, they still have loads of other problems. There’s no sign the Tramp will be more responsible with their baby, which was shown to be a problem based on Mabel’s response. It’d pay for him to stop getting into bar fights, but maybe the characters don’t care as that’s not shown to be a problem here? The Tramp doesn’t get in trouble. When Mabel thought the Tramp was cheating on her, she gets mad and starts beating on him, seeming unable to listen to him. The ending is fun, with the dust clearing only for Phyllis to discover that Mack was cheating on her. We get yet more spousal abuse, which is unfortunately a common trope. There’s not a sign that Mabel will be more respectful of the Tramp when there’s the appearance of him doing something wrong. You can imagine the attitude of the filmmakers is that women hitting their husbands isn’t a big deal, and possibly the same with husbands hitting their wives.

OVERVIEW

As is standard, this short doesn’t have enough going for it to be worthwhile. It’d be interesting to see if someone could fan edit the best bits from the poor shorts and make a highlight reel of sorts. The bar scene here could’ve happened in numerous other installments.

His Musical Career (1914) Review // The Tramp #22

Mack Swain and Charlie Chaplin

His Musical Career is unfortunately more of the lesser Chaplin. There’s a lot of filler of the Tramp and Mack Swain goofing around. The two are essentially a comedy duo here. They do serviceably, but they don’t elevate the material. Chaplin and Jess Dandy in His New Profession were a better duo. As has been a common problem, their opening scenes seem like bottom of the barrel filler, with the jokes almost coming across as them improvising material that is a light chuckle at the very best. More could’ve been done with the main premise of this film. It’s not a story a lot could be taken from, but there is something here. Let’s mine it for all it’s worth! Let’s get really interesting supporting actors that can be funny. The Tramp is looking for work. That could’ve had some relevance later, like he runs into his old boss or at the end he is fired again and he mentions now once again needing employment. It’s funny to think he was fired from his restaurant job from Dough and Dynamite.

It seems the Tramp at one point decides to drink from a random container. The Tramp carrying a piano on his back suggests he’s very strong. That looks awfully painful. Later, the Tramp continues to push on the piano despite Mack telling him not to. Can he not hear Mack? What could’ve been the centerpiece of the film is when the Tramp has to get the piano up a long flight of stairs. So many things could’ve hilariously gone wrong, but the Tramp essentially just falls down a little and that’s it. As if no one understood how to resolve this scene, we awkwardly cut and are onto the next bit.

SPOILERS

The duo accidentally gave a piano to someone who wanted to get rid of one and took a piano from someone who wanted another one. There is a lot of potential there. There are nice absurdist jokes like the two addresses they have to go to being, “666 Prospect Street” and “999 Prospect Street”. The man intending to get rid of a piano doesn’t seem to mind receiving one. That makes for a fun character trait that could’ve been elaborated on more. As is, it is pretty much a plot hole. The fact one of the houses is rich and the other poor could’ve served as commentary. The Tramp and Mack getting around on a donkey wagon is also a brilliantly weird idea.

Mack drinks varnish and the Tramp runs around, at one point dumping a container on him for no reason, as if that will get rid of the varnish? An especially predictable and unnatural gag is when the Tramp accidentally sets a piano on Mack’s head. It’s unnatural because this wouldn’t sensibly have happened, but everyone has to just be dumb for this second in order for it to occur. One of the better moments is when the donkey is lifted in the air due to how heavy the piano is. The Tramp is amusing in trying to resituate things and continue on his way. He seems playful and not stupid or malicious.

Mack for some reason pushes down a man who tries to stop him from taking the piano. While it’s supposed to be funny he would do this, he’s just acting randomly here and thus it’s not engaging or amusing. This does lead to an interesting thought, why does Mack work, especially doing something so laborious? The answer is for money. He is so blinded and numbed by just wanting to do his job that he will not listen to his own customers telling him he’s making a mistake. He seemingly just sees them as something in his way, with them trying to stop him from what he thinks is him properly doing his job. The fact the poor man seemed happy to get a piano might imply he was only getting rid of it out of desperation for money. Mack knocking down a rich man in order to do his job and get paid is a step away from saying something. It’d be nice to see later Chaplin try this story out as there’s so much to explore.

Mack and the Tramp parked by the house. When they leave they start walking down a hill. Maybe their donkey walked away, but that wasn’t established? They don’t acknowledge its absence. I wonder if the reason they were riding a donkey in the first place is that that’s a reason for how their ride may have been absent at the end. After they begin falling, a man is in front of them. He disappears after a cut. After a little more sliding down, there’s a cut to them falling in a lake without us seeing it beforehand. It looks like they’re on a street and not anywhere close to a lake. It’s just thrown in. Hopefully there’s lost footage here because if this is how this sequence was edited, then it’s probably the worst moment of Chaplin editing so far.

OVERVIEW

I wonder if anyone was disappointed about not getting a short where the Tramp has a career as a musician, which the title implies. He doesn’t do anything musical here. The pianos could’ve been replaced with anything that’s big and would be hard to move around. There’s a few chuckles, but this one isn’t worthwhile. In fact, starting with the step forward that was The New Janitor, each short has been worse than the one before it, though there are good qualities that make them a little more interesting as documents of Chaplin’s progression. One is that the Tramp doesn’t do too bad a job at working this installment, though of course he does do a lot wrong. Also, Charley Chase has been progressively looking more and more like Charley Chase.

Gentlemen of Nerve (1914) Review // The Tramp #21

The imposing Mack Swain and Charlie Chaplin in the film

There is a certain question left on the tongue when viewing these later Keystone entries, was Chaplin generally alternating between a film with a stronger story, and one with a weaker story that was more reminiscent of the earlier installments of his series? Gentlemen of Nerve’s predecessor is certainly a stronger work. It doesn’t even seem there was much of an attempt to give Nerve a story. That isn’t a problem if the humor and performances are good… When Mack Swain is standing in front of an entrance, the Tramp hits him with his cane instead of simply asking him to move. Yet more of the Tramp being violent just because. A sound film would probably feature him verbally asking Mack to move, so this element is probably here so we can get a visual.

The Tramp and Mack are briefly friendly for no reason other than gags. If they wanted those moments, why have moments of them in conflict beforehand? Their jokes are decent enough, but they’re predictable to the point that many of these scenes could’ve been included in numerous other films. Imagine in The Property Man if Chaplin did with Joe Bordeaux and “Garlico” what he does with Swain here? Imagine if what he does in Property he instead does here? Jess Dandy and Swain both play the same types of characters and each could reasonably do the other’s role in a movie, though Dandy is less exaggerated by a little.

Mabel, jealous of a woman talking to her boyfriend, stomps her foot. Mabel has a light and playful performance, acting in a way like a female “the Tramp”. If the real Charlie Chaplin and Mabel Normand got married, you could imagine a series of comedies where they play a Trampish couple. Maybe Normand was too old? Here, Mabel and Chester Conklin play a couple. Of all Mabel’s wacky boyfriends, this might be the least believable one. He is more comical than the others, but seeing as he’s the Snub Pollard-role, it makes sense that the Tramp’s rival would have the main girl. The Tramp sprays a bottle of something through a wall. The direction it’s pointing in isn’t the direction it’s coming out of. The liquid also looks different depending on which side of the wall it is appearing in. At one point he steals a woman’s drink and she doesn’t seem to care. Amusingly, when he is preparing to have a fight, he hands his cane and jacket to a random woman behind him. Throughout the movie, she can be seen watching the Tramp’s shenanigans, sometimes smiling. There’s a moment where the Tramp’s hat falls off and she hands it to him.

Miscellaneous comments: Here Chaplin’s character is named “Mr. Wow-Wow”, while acting and dressing like the Tramp. Based on some Tramp films naming the character “Charlie”, perhaps the character’s full name is “Charlie Wow-Wow”? A cop is violent. Who is hiring these guys? I would say perhaps one of Chaplin’s characters, like Lord Helpus, is, but I think we could call it one way or another by tracing the lineage of those hiring the police now. Despite criticisms of “blandness”, there is an unexpected moment in the story.

SPOILERS

The Tramp appears to get a happy ending. Chester and Mack get arrested and the Tramp is forming a relationship with Mabel. He seemed to be about as silly and violent as the other two, so who knows why he was deserving of getting the girl, especially when he so often doesn’t? The Tramp is genuinely charming when talking to Mabel. You get the impression he is happier and more confident here than normally. Both have better chemistry than in the film where they were married, Mabel’s Married Life. Maybe this is a prequel to that?

OVERVIEW

The ending is the only particularly interesting part. It could’ve and probably should’ve been added to a different film. It’d be nice to see a whole movie that expands on that, playing up the romance angle.

Dough and Dynamite (1914) Review // The Tramp #20

The Knockout (1914)

Keystone Studio’s founder Mack Sennett called Dough and Dynamite a “breakout” film for Charlie Chaplin. Its plot takes joy in being delightfully absurd while also having a progression of stakes. Still, it has many of the common issues that are sometimes overlooked in Chaplin’s films that represent a step forward in filmmaking for him. The film starts poorly with the Tramp just being a bit of a nuisance randomly. He doesn’t feel like a real person or even a thought out character, but merely an agent of destruction. The things he does are pretty predictable and basic. The gags like him touching a hot handle, dropping plates on the ground, or throwing bread he dropped at his boss, as he was missing the counter, feel like very little was put into making them interesting. This type of character works better if the material is great, but it’s too inane here. While the Tramp as usually has many incompetencies, he appears to be inching towards being better. Unless the boss is stupid beyond stupid, the Tramp is competent enough to not have been fired already. The former takeaway is certainly not impossible.

Miscellaneous comments include: It’s amusing that even when the Tramp is at a job where generally people dress nice, he’s wearing a relatively nice jacket that’s still too small and his baggy pants. It’s as if he has multiple large pairs of pants and small jackets and he wears the nicer ones on special occasions. A man points a knife at the Tramp and he turns it around to point at the man when he isn’t looking. The Tramp walks out of his way in order for him to step in some dough. Why not have it so the dough was dropped in his path? The Tramp almost touches a hot handle, so instead moves it with his foot. Earlier touching it with his foot burned him, but now it doesn’t. Throughout the film, the dough sometimes looks a little different or is more or less sticky. It appears to be whatever it needs to be for the plot.

Expectedly, there’s a lot of filler. In fact, there’s so much that it betrays the two-reel length. The filler is especially frustrating as the main concept of workers retaliating against their job and that job recruiting incompetent replacements is an excellent idea. There’s a lot of comedic potential in it and specifically comedy that seeps from the core of that idea, instead of being incidental. Imagine if the workers would find ways to sabotage something the Tramp is doing and he’s blamed for it as if he was being incompetent? Maybe the ending is him actually being incompetent and that somehow fixes everything? What if the workers all go to another job and for some absurd reason, the original workers at that second job quit and work at the first where the Tramp is?

SPOILERS

One of the funniest elements is that the Tramp drops a large bag on Chester and in the background of two scenes Chester is just laying on the ground with the bag on top of him, without him being acknowledged. It would’ve been nice if this happened as soon as possible, then we get the gags of the Tramp without Chester, all so we can have the most amount of scenes possible with Chester just in the background like that. It’s glorious how dumb it is for the workers to decide to put dynamite in some bread. They all shake hands like it’s the most brilliant thing they’ve ever thought of. It’s especially silly that they have an innocent-looking girl give it to the boss. That is such an immense slap in the face to reality that it becomes genius. The Tramp’s destructive nature has plot relevance when he dumps some water harshly and unknowingly dumps it over a fence at the workers.

The Tramp and Chester’s fights are unexpectedly intense, as if every Chester in these movies is the same person and he’s now at the breaking point from all the recurring abuse. When the Tramp accidentally gets stuck in one place, Chester hits him chaotically over and over, as if he finally has and is taking his chance to get him back. At one point, the Tramp just decides to hit Chester (for no reason). As he goes to grab some dough, Chester stands still, perhaps accepting his fate. The score for this is just a drumroll. It’s such a hilarious moment.

The plot of the boss thinking the Tramp was flirting with his wife is pretty forced in, probably just there so there could be a fight scene. If they needed a fight scene, why not have anything other than one of the most generic tropes of the era be the reason for it? Not that a fight is usually preferable. The final shot of the Tramp emerging from dough cuts way too fast, but isn’t too bad a gag. With better setup and payoff it could be a riot. It is undeniably among the most memorable images of this era of Chaplin.

An intertitle like, “The Fatal Loaf” is so hilarious that it demands to be part of a film that has a wittier sense of humor.

OVERVIEW

There’s the impression the workers didn’t really want anything as they aren’t shown achieving or failing to achieve anything practical. They just destroy and we don’t see them react to the destruction, nor do we get a response to it other than a little light comedy from a few main characters. That lack of resolution makes this not particularly satisfying. Off of this film, you could think Charlie Chaplin didn’t like unioners and thus wanted to simply attack them here. That doesn’t seem to actually be the case. Dough and Dynamite is nice as a stepping stone to greener pastures, but the story and jokes aren’t good enough to justify its length. There are a few great moments. Also, spot the Charley Chase cameo!

Those Love Pangs (1914) Review // The Tramp #19

Chaplin in the butt

Those Love Pangs continues the trend of being a better version of the Keystone formula of weak stories and a focus on gags. Chaplin’s skill as a director is apparent, with more depth to the frames than before. It’s a shame so many of these shorts, including this one, are set in a park. It almost feels like it’s always the same one. Chaplin’s very in tune with his performance, adding little nuances to his movements or how he handles a situation, like how he hits or controls people. He also seems to have a large sense of control over his cane, like everything he does with it is thought out. The other actors are a lot less subtle than him and thus don’t work as well. You’d think Chaplin would realize this is a problem and strive for better performances.

Miscellaneous comments include: The Tramp believes Chester Conklin that there’s a woman under the table when that obviously couldn’t be true. A highlight is when the Tramp drags Chester along with his cane. Money is put in a man’s left pocket, only for it to later be in his right. A cop is violent. The female characters are all very weak here in terms of characterization. The male ones are a little better realized. The women’s performances could help give them an impact, though it’s possible Chaplin didn’t want them to do more than they did.

SPOILERS

The Tramp must’ve stabbed Chester pretty hard for the fork to stick to him, same when Chester does that back. When the Tramp talks to Helen Carruthers, he is standing by the curtain, where obviously Chester will try to hurt him. He seems to realize this as he moves away, swaps places with Helen, then moves back. Why not just leave that general area? The Tramp and Chester briefly become friends for seemingly no reason. It seems Chaplin wanted gags that would fit best at the start and with the two as enemies, then have gags of them as friends, and then later more “enemy” ones. An example of one of the better ones is when the Tramp pretends to get lightheaded by a bar, so Chester will give him some money to get something. He’s manipulating his kindness. A lot of Keystone characters would rather someone faint than help them, especially monetarily.

An angry man goes up to the Tramp and puts his arm on the bench the Tramp is sitting at. Briefly, the man talks to his girlfriend and the Tramp slides right by him to escape. In keeping with his character, the Tramp can’t resist hitting the man, at the cost of not having as easy a time getting away. One of the best scenes is when that man is scolding the Tramp by a lake. It seems the former wants to be the bigger man, as whenever it seems the Tramp might slip and fall in the water, the man helps him stay up. Ultimately the man is frustrated to the point of picking up the Tramp and doing the classic “ragdoll” bit, strangling him as he lifts him up by the neck. As soon as the Tramp gets the upper hand, he throws the man in the lake. While this scene is suspenseful in wondering how it will escalate, it would’ve been funnier if the man’s desire to be cordial was only broken in the final scene, instead of at this earlier point. Later, Chester sees the man and hits him for no reason. There isn’t even the perception he did something to Chester.

The female characters are quite weak. One will have a boyfriend and then when he is beaten in a fight by another man, they’re just in love with that new man. This happens more than once. While you could argue this is supposed to be silly, it just isn’t funny. What is the joke? This short has one of the most well-earned “ending fights”, as it was clearly being built up to the whole film slowly. A lot of Chester and the Tramp’s antics progressively added tension to them, as if Chester was more and more wanting to one-up the Tramp. The ending fight could’ve been funnier. Imagine if the man did what he did earlier where he picks up the Tramp by the neck and strangles him, only here he throws him at the cinema screen afterwards.

OVERVIEW

Everybody involved seems to be having fun here, so that element is infectious. That being said, Those Love Pangs doesn’t do anything exceptionally well and has some of the things that make Keystone films generally poor, so it’s only really for dedicated fans.

ON THE CORNER AND OFF THE WALL

When I was watching the Chaplin at Keystone series in 2018 and 2019, this was the last film I watched before stopping. I can now assuredly say, “On we go!”

The New Janitor (1914) Review // The Tramp #18

Chaplin in the film

After a dud before it, The New Janitor continues to push the bar of what a Charlie Chaplin film could be. The characters are better defined and the story can manage some buildup, instead of feeling solely like a collection of scenes. Despite that, there is some filler and gags that could’ve been in any Keystone film, like when water falls on someone. There are also some plot conveniences. Positives include moments of the Tramp being mistreated, like when he has to walk up the stairs because someone won’t let him take the elevator. That’s a nice character moment, but those character moments only go so far. There’s too few of them. Imagine scenes of the Tramp really coming off as depressed from being picked on like that. Imagine seeing torment on his face. There is some of this, like when he seems fed up with work at the end, but the scene would be more powerful if the tension progressed over the course of the runtime.

The other cast members could’ve given funnier performances, but it seems they might’ve been asked to underplay it as they are relatively straight here. It seems possible we’re supposed to be really liking Helen Carruthers’ character, but she makes too little an impression. John T. Dillon is too hammy, but he doesn’t go too far; someone like Ford Sterling might’ve. This short is a little light on jokes. The ending has some good ones, though. The film gives a lot of attention to the story, which is a bit too bland. Still, there are enough jokes and general good moments for it to not be too uninteresting. The Tramp is shown as a hero here, a far cry from how he typically is. He is mostly portrayed as sympathetic. The 180 degree rule is broken between the shots inside a room and out.

The Tramp is still clownish and prone to mistakes, but that’s toned down. It would’ve been ideal to see him progress more out of that behavior. He doesn’t appear to be drunk here, so that would certainly help with his competency. Scenes of him dropping things are mainly offensive due to being such bland moments.

SPOILERS

The Tramp horrifically almost dies in a casual scene where he sits on a windowsill and nearly falls out. This isn’t the first time he’s nearly escaped death. Helen spots John stealing from the bank and he threatens her life. She pushes a button to call for the janitor. There is honest suspense to, “Is the Tramp going to go upstairs in time and save her?” It’s a reasonably thrilling moment. There’s no “big dumb Keystone fight”, as these often end. There is a one-on-one fight that doesn’t strike as similar to the other Keystone ones. It’s a tighter shot and the two seem to be doing more interesting movements that are more than just running around. They may have been choreographed. There’s fewer cuts, as well. The Tramp kicks a police officer at one point, possibly to try to make this climax seem more in line with other endings. Also, the Tramp is not arrested for doing this. While the Tramp kicking him is a little strange if you’re only watching this film, he does hit a lot of policemen in the series.

To alert the police officer, the Tramp fires a gun out the window. He could’ve hit someone by doing that. It doesn’t make sense the Tramp would be so bad at things like looking where he’s going, then be able to disarm John so easily. It’s still a funny and impressive sequence. The Tramp gets a happy ending here. He looks good at his job, gets some money, and possibly gets the girl. The latter doesn’t explicitly happen, but it seems implied.

OVERVIEW

Neither the plot nor comedy are so compelling to make this a necessity, but The New Janitor avoids many of the trappings of other Keystone films. There’s not a lot of mindless action and characters, but it seems Chaplin may have wanted to include elements that would make this fit in with Keystone more, to the movie’s detriment. Despite the faults, it functions well as a sign of the future. There’s a nice little story that’s not half-baked, though said story is bland. It’s most interesting as an early example of the sympathetic Tramp.

The Rounders (1914) Review

Chaplin in the film

We might be seeing the second time where “Chaplin at Keystone” generally begun to improve, only to reintroduce films with its common problems. You could believe The Rounders was an early film given a late release. It’s somewhat reminiscent of films like Mabel’s Strange Predicament. It starts with a little of Chaplin walking around and being silly in a hotel or apartment. Charlie falls and tips his hat. This could almost be a scene from Predicament, except for Chaplin wearing nicer clothes and the set not being the same (though it is similar). Also like the Mabel film, Chaplin simply being a clown among laymen is its highlight. Such a joke isn’t great or something that has to be seen, but it’s not overcomplicated or too tedious. He is especially a highlight in comparison to the other actors. One favorite moment is when Charlie falls on his bed and his legs stick up and rest on the bed frame.

There is an insane amount of overacting, notably from Phyllis Allen and Minta Durfee as the wives of Chaplin and Roscoe Arbuckle’s characters respectively. This is especially noticeable in a scene of the two women sobbing together. They have the same response to everything, always hitting and arguing without ever coming down and feeling like they could be a real person. A scene of a large group of people exploding into mindless gesticulating also feels disconnected from anything going on, as if someone was asked, “Just get really upset”. Arbuckle doesn’t do very much here and Chaplin manages to not overdo his portrayal, so both men are generally better than the other actors.

My criticism of Keystone’s violence doesn’t come from an inherent disliking of it in comedy. The problem is that it’s essentially one joke that has been used constantly and in substitute of other ways to define a character or in general, get laughs. This problem is especially bad here as the implication seems to be that domestic abuse is funny, which feels a lot more personal than something like someone fighting a Keystone Cop. If you had a drinking game where every time a Keystone film ended in a big fight you took a drink, the drinkers would be doomed.

Chaplin and Allen are the “Fulls” and Arbuckle and Durfee the “Fullers”. That bit of wordplay is pretty amusing. Chaplin acting and dressing similar to his character in Tango Tangles, both cladded in a tuxedo, makes me wonder if this was intended to be the same character as Mr. Full. If you argue that characters not dressed in a tuxedo and could be Mr. Full are also Mr. Full, save for the Tramp and the Making a Living character, then you could say this is the sixth Full film behind A Thief Catcher, Tango Tangles, possibly Her Friend The Bandit, The Knockout, and Mabel’s Busy Day. In which case this would be the third of four Chaplin characters. In order they’d go the Making a Living one (named “Lord Helpus” in Cruel, Cruel Love), The Tramp, Mr. Full, and the A Busy Day one. If you take that the Tillie’s Punctured Romance character is Mr. Full, then his full name is Charlie Full.

SPOILERS

Both Roscoe and his wife are abusive to each other. Roscoe at one point strangles her. Phyllis sends the drunk and barely able to stand Charlie to go deal with the Fullers. Why would she do that? Just go yourself! Minta predictably hits Charlie after he’s sent in the room. One of the better gags is when Charlie is punted across the rooms in-between Roscoe and Phyllis. Another gag that emphasizes Chaplin’s “ragdoll” style is when Roscoe drags him as they casually walk. The sequence is pretty cute. The wives seem to mind their husbands leaving during their argument. Who cares if they want to leave?

There’s not a significance to the men stealing their wives’ money. It’s not like they spend it or do something with it. They simply sleep at a restaurant, which they could’ve done without taking the money. Charlie just bothering a diner at the restaurant isn’t grounded or connectable in any way. It’s like he’s just thinking of anything he can do to annoy the diner and get laughs. The restaurant really overacts in response to the men taking a nap. Charlie hits one in response to them talking to him. Thus, we now get a big fight like we’ve seen a thousand times before. However, The final joke of Charlie and Roscoe being submerged in water slowly is quite good.

OVERVIEW

I’d have to think that even a fan of the standard Keystone would find The Rounders tiresome, especially after watching similar things happen in many other Chaplin films before. It’s more disappointing when compared to the recent dramatic highlight of The Face on the Barroom Floor and the big dumb violent fun of The Masquerader, which utilizes Keystone’s trappings as strengths.